It’s amazing how many people have became experts in public health in less than a year. Many of these people, like state governors and provincial premiers, use their newfound knowledge to make major decisions that affect the health of millions of people. Professionals working in the field of public health generally have at least six years of training, for a medical degree and/or a master’s degree in public health. Does anyone believe that politicians are so much smarter than health professionals that they can become experts in a year?
Public Health covers a very wide range of areas, from managing and monitoring disease to biosafety and security.
https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health.html
Contrary to what some people might think, public health did not just evolve in the last year with the onset of the coronavirus pandemic. Public Health has been an evolving scientific discipline for a long time.
Lockdown and other social distancing measures are not unique to the coronavirus pandemic. There are many articles and books about how plagues were dealt with in the past.
“From the onset of the Black Death in 1347-48, Italian cities which faced the Mediterranean, an epidemic sea, constructed a complex and articulated health defence system which was an example to all other western countries. The cornerstones of this health defence system lay in quarantine, sanitary cordons, lazarets, disinfection, and in the social regulation of the population at risk.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19227587/
“Popular narratives continually included grievances about the cruelty and inequity of quarantine and the militaristic nature of its implementation. Despite these objections, quarantine remained a staple of the government response to plague outbreaks throughout the seventeenth century.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22611587/
The Public Health Act in Britain was passed in 1848. It aimed to improve the sanitary condition of towns in England and Wales by placing the supply of water, sewerage, drainage, cleansing and paving under a single local body with the General Board of Health.
The Vaccination Act 1853 introduced compulsory smallpox vaccination in England and Wales.
The Infectious Disease (Notification) Act 1889 mandated the reporting of infectious diseases to the local sanitary authority, which could then pursue measures such as the removal of the patient to hospital and the disinfection of homes and properties.
The first public health organization in the U.S. was in New York City in 1866.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_health#After_the_18th_century
In 1905 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the legitimacy of compulsory vaccination in Jacobson vs. Massachusetts. The Court compared the right to enact public health measures during an epidemic to the right of a government to defend its people from a military invasion. They compared the right to compel individuals to be vaccinated, whether they wanted to or not, to the power to conscript people to raise an army. This remains the major case in public health law today.
https://www.brandeis.edu/now/2020/may/smallpox-and-coronavirus-willrich.html
The current controversy raging over mandating vaccination for Covid-19 is at odds with long-standing principles encased in law going back over 100 years.
Why is there a debate over vaccine mandates?
The various measures being proposed to mandate vaccinations are not compulsory orders requiring people to get vaccinated. They are just simple rules made for public health, that in specified areas, unvaccinated people pose a health risk to other vaccinated people in that space, and so unvaccinated people are to be restricted from entering that space. The space may be hospitals, restaurants, stores, or offices under the jurisdiction of a particular health authority. Such decisions are clearly within the bounds of public health authority.
Private companies also have the right to ban unvaccinated employees from the workplace for the safety of their employees. Many American companies, including those operating in Canada, require a medical exam as part of a job application. The information is not given to the employee but is used by the employer in any way they wish and may be used to deny employment.
One reason there is so much debate over vaccine mandates is that many public health officials have not taken initiative and leadership throughout the pandemic. Many have been working in a government bureaucracy for their whole career and they did not step forward when the pandemic was recognized to insist on instituting public health measures, even though that is supposed to be an important part of their job. They continually deferred to the political leaders, even when those leaders made bad public health decisions. A good example of this was David Williams, the chief medical officer of Ontario. He was a typical dry bureaucrat with little foresight or initiative and rarely challenged decisions made by Premier Doug Ford. In spite of criticisms and calls for him to resign, from many parts of the medical and public health community, Ford reappointed him for another term. However, shortly after starting his term, Williams finally saw the light and announced he would retire in June 2021.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-top-doctor-pandemic-retirement-1.6046068
Only in extreme cases have public health officials overridden bad decisions made by politicians. One case of this was when Premier Ford in Ontario was very slow to bring in measures to control the large spike of the third wave. In response, the City of Toronto’s medical officer of health issued an order to close the schools, even though the Ontario Education Minister said the provincial government believed schools were safe and not sources of transmission of Covid-19.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/toronto-closing-schools-covid-19-1.5976923
What should have been done?
If more public health officials had just done their job and issued orders to protect public health, without deliberating and knuckling under political pressure, a lot of bad decisions made in managing the pandemic could have been avoided.
Restricting unvaccinated people from public places, such as hospitals, airplanes, trains, restaurants, shopping and office buildings where they are a health threat to others is just good public health practice, nothing more. The debate over requiring medical workers to be vaccinated is particularly ludicrous – people who go into a hospital for medical treatment should not be exposed to an increased risk of getting Covid-19. This has nothing to do with “personal freedom of choice”, it is fundamental public health where the health of the public is being protected.
It is clear that a lot of people from citizens to people in power do not really understand what public health is and don’t feel it is an obligation and a priority of society, even though it is science that has been developed for hundreds of years and has corresponding laws that can be enacted by public health officials when necessary.
People who are demonstrating against vaccine mandates do not oppose the government requiring them to get a license to drive a motor vehicle. It is the law, and the purpose of the law is to protect innocent people from being injured by drivers who do not have adequate vision or safe driving skills. The purpose of public health is exactly the same – to protect innocent people from getting infected with a serious illness by people who are carriers of the disease.